The creator Arnold is, though the sun of a rich father, living in the streets of a future US to flee his father and his strong will – and to pursue AI and robotics research, culminating in a robot so humanlike that it can fool all people. She is called Maggie and her story – though she is a robot – is a some kind of story how to become human.
Looking at the humans in the world, with some senses more powerful than humans, she sometimes can understand humans better than humans themselves – as she is certainly less preoccupied.
It is fascinating to see how she learns about the world and the humans she meets – how she is drawn to the other AIs on the net because they have a much deeper relationship (faster for example), but still likes to live in the ‘real world’. The story contains also very different responses of humans who eventually find out or get told that she is a robot.
Contained in the story are also some more philosophical thoughts about what makes a person, including what it means to be able to copy one and have duplicates, and what it means to be ‘programmed’ – which basically are the same questions coming up for humans too, if you think about it …

All in all it is a very positive and quite moving story about robots and AIs, in a more or less paranoid and somewhat dystopian environment of humans.

There are also a few remarks about free will which I find interesting:

The mother of all patterns in an intelligent system is the self. If a system can recognize the coherent, holistic pattern of its own self, by observing its actions in the world and the world’s responses to it—then the system can build a self, or what psychologists call a self-model. And a reasonably accurate, dynamically updated self-model is the key to adaptiveness, to the ability to confront new problems as they arise in the course of interacting with the world and with other minds.

And if a system can recognize itself, it can recognize probabilistic relationships between itself and various effects in the world. It can recognize patterns of the form “If I do X, then Y is likely to occur.” This leads to the pattern known as will. There are important senses in which the conventional human concept of ‘free will’ is an illusion—but it’s an important illusion, critical for guiding the actions of an intelligent agent as it navigates its environments. In order to achieve human-level general intelligence, a pattern-recognizing system must be able to model itself and then model the effects of various states its self may take—and this amounts to modeling personal will and causation.

The trick of digital mind design, then, is not any particular way of representing, recognizing or enacting patterns: it’s creating a pattern-recognition system, by hook or by crook, that can recognize some critical key patterns: self, will, reflective awareness. Once these patterns are recognized, then some critical recursions kick in and a mind can monitor itself, shape itself, improve itself. The question is how do we get a pattern-recognition system to that point, given the available computational resources? This is the question to which my Novamente AI design is intended to give one possible answer.

Link: http://www.longnow.org/views/essays/articles/ArtEden.php

For 30 years I have been wondering, what indication of its existence might we expect from a true AI? Certainly not any explicit revelation, which might spark a movement to pull the plug. Anomalous accumulation or creation of wealth might be a sign, or an unquenchable thirst for raw information, storage space, and processing cycles, or a concerted attempt to secure an uninterrupted, autonomous power supply. But the real sign, I suspect, would be a circle of cheerful, contented, intellectually and physically well-nourished people surrounding the AI. There wouldn’t be any need for True Believers, or the downloading of human brains or anything sinister like that: just a gradual, gentle, pervasive and mutually beneficial contact between us and a growing something else. This remains a non-testable hypothesis, for now. The best description comes from science fiction writer Simon Ings:
“When our machines overtook us, too complex and efficient for us to control, they did it so fast and so smoothly and so usefully, only a fool or a prophet would have dared complain.”

Indeed … and even more provoking, this is said in the context of a description of his visit to Google headquarters.